In the fall of 2012, organ consultant Jonathan Ambrosino visited Christ Church to give us an assessment of the 1975 Austin Organ in our church. His detailed report analyzed the condition of our organ as well as its limitations. He noted that the instrument should likely continue for another decade before requiring any major attention, but also noted that the organ is not musically remarkable, lacking in “character, variety and loveliness of tone,” and that its appearance “gives itself away as a child of the Modern Movement. Rather than echoing the ornamental grammar of its surroundings, it gives the impression of an industrial object.” Guest organists over the past 13 years have all made similar comments.

In recent years, the cost of upkeep on this instrument has been increasing. Due to consistent electrical problems, I regularly have to maneuver some of the interior electrical circuits to restore the memory system; this is why the back of the organ is now always left off (to save time when the problems develop in the middle of a service – which is often). And, there are a number of significant (and expensive) repairs looming in the near future. I have been worried for some time about funding for these costs, and dreading the energy and expense we would be devoting to an instrument that would, in the end, still be undistinguished and not visually suitable for our historic space.

organ-manuals.jpg

 

Cap & Marilyn Bromley made a significant gift to the parish for the purpose of the organ in 2016. Shortly after receiving their gift, an organ committee formed to consider our options. The committee members are Cap & Marilyn Bromley, The Rev. Dr. Bill Roberts, Jay Bartol, Anne Shine, Barry Stauffer, Julie Wommack, Bill Usher, and myself.

The committee carefully reviewed Ambrosino’s report, and received an update on some recent problems with the organ. We also consulted organists who were familiar with our instrument. Before long, the committee came to the unanimous decision to consider a new organ for Christ Church rather than continuing to rely on the 1975 instrument.

Many organ builders expressed interest in this project. We decided to solicit proposals from seven excellent builders. Each firm came to visit Christ Church, listened to the current instrument, carefully considered what our musical needs are, and submitted a proposal on the instrument they would be capable of building for us. 

Our committee narrowed the search to two builders. I traveled to play and listen to instruments by each firm. We would not have gone wrong with either one. Both finalists showed great respect for our historic building, the need for an instrument that visually belongs in such an iconic church, and one of great artistic beauty.

Our historic building was not designed with an organ in mind. The low ceiling and limited space for pipes present a unique challenge. However, we made it clear that we hoped to have a new organ that “looks like it has always been here.” Both of our finalists presented wonderful renderings of how the new organ would appear in the church. After discussions with many organists and reviewing financial elements of the companies and histories, we came to the decision that the sixth organ installed in Christ Church will be built by Harrison & Harrison Organ Builders. They are located in Durham, England. The first organ installed in Christ Church was also ordered from England! In the summer of 2017, the vestry unanimously approved our committee’s decision and we signed a contract with Harrison & Harrison.

Harrison & Harrison (H&H) is well known to organists. Some of their most notable instruments are in place at King’s College Chapel in Cambridge, Westminster Abbey, and Wells Cathedral. They have built several organs in American churches as well.

Additionally, the favorable exchange rate works to our advantage financially.

The H&H proposal calls for a smaller yet more efficient organ than what we currently have. The new instrument will be two-manuals with mechanical action. This means that pressing a key down physically opens a wind supply via pulleys to the appropriate pipe(s) rather than using an electronic relay. From the congregation’s viewpoint, the main benefit of mechanical action is longevity, and rather less costly overhauls. Similarly, it will occupy a different footprint (space) than the current one. The organ will be housed in one case that will be at the center of the balcony (returning somewhat to the layout/design of two of the previous instruments that have been in Christ Church). Due to our dry acoustic, nearly all of the builders recommended placing a central case in the gallery so that the sound comes from one location and not from the sides of the gallery. Nevertheless, the new layout will actually allow us more open floor space in the gallery than currently exists.

The new organ will be designed with the accompaniment of singers in mind – H&H has stated that warmth, breadth, and blending will be among its characteristics. It will be voiced to provide excellent accompaniment for the choir and also support a strong singing congregation. The new organ will not be louder than the current one, nor will it be bigger, but it will have a gentler tone and a more pleasing palette of sounds. 

I believe this new instrument will have an amazing and monumental impact on the worship life at Christ Church. Several colleagues who are aware of our decision have expressed great excitement for our parish. I’ve even received a few calls from individuals who have heard through the grapevine of our plans, and are asking to play recitals here!

organ-rendering.png

 

Patience, we are reminded, is a virtue. Due to the popularity of H&H, there is a wait-list for churches to get one of their instruments. So, we now must wait patiently in line. They project that our instrument will arrive for installation in the fall of 2020. It could happen slightly sooner, but as with most building projects, we probably should not expect that to happen.

What will happen to our current organ? Well, we hope to find someone interested in buying and removing it. It is possible that the pipes could be used in other instruments and/or the organ could be repurposed for a new space. There likely will be a gap in time when we no longer have the current organ but the new one has not yet arrived. During that period we will rely on a rented electronic organ or the piano. I have no concerns about us losing our parish’s ability to sing heartily regardless of the accompaniment!

I am certain this new instrument will be celebrated for generations to come and future worshipers will be thankful for our congregation’s decision to install this organ in Christ Church.

You can play an important part in helping this project come to a completion. We still need more money to pay for the new organ. An anonymous donor has augmented the Bromley gift. In addition, many people donated in memory of Bill Usher – an organ committee member who died last fall. We are grateful that his wife Fran is now a member of our group.

If you are interested in donating to this project (there is still approximately $400,000 to be raised), please speak with Noelle, myself, or any member of our organ committee. 

It might seem an odd time to be looking to spend money on a new organ. However, I remind everyone that we were looking at some significant expenses (perhaps a few hundred thousand dollars) on our current instrument if we planned to use it indefinitely into the future. And, at the end of that project, we would still be stuck with a “musically undistinguished” instrument which does not blend visually with the remainder of our church’s interior. The reality of our existing organ and the contract with H&H began before our more recent parish budgetary concerns. Yet, once it is installed maintenance will be lower – good news in the financial long run. 

This new organ could well have a lifespan more likely recorded in centuries than in decades. When one considers the weekly demands of the instrument (funerals, weddings, Evensongs, weekly worship services, etc.) over the course of many, many years, it ends up being a very good investment.

Our committee is deeply indebted to the following musicians who generously offered their opinions/insights/thoughts/suggestions during our process:

Dr. Daniel Aune (Christ Lutheran Church, Baltimore)

Nichols Bideler (The Church of St. Michael and St. George, St. Louis)

Dr. Kevin Clarke (St. Theresa Catholic Church, Sugarland, TX)

Dr. Robbe Delcamp (The University of the South, Sewanee)

Jacob Fuhrman (St. Joseph’s Catholic Church, Penfield, NY)

Brad Gee (St. James Episcopal Church, Hendersonville, NC)

Dr. Brian Harlow (St. Luke’s, Gladstone, NJ)

Zachary Hemenway (St. Paul’s Chestnut Hill, Philadelphia)

Christopher Jennings (St. John on the Mountain, Bernardsville, NJ)

Dr. Robert Lehman (The Church of St. Michael and St. George, St. Louis)

Steve Loher (The First Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston)

Robert McCormick (St. Mark’s, Philadelphia)

Dr. Bruce Neswick (Trinity Cathedral, Portland, OR)

Andrew Scanlon (St. Paul’s Church, Greenville, NC)

Dr. Patrick Scott (The Cathedral of St. Philip, Atlanta)

Thomas Smith (Christ Church, Georgetown)

The Rev. Benjamin Straley (Washington National Cathedral)

Dr. Richard Webster (Trinity Church, Boston)

This is an exciting moment at Christ Church – thanks be to God! 

“When in our music God is glorified, and adoration leaves no room for pride, it is as though the whole creation cried – Alleluia!” – Hymn 420